Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

The eLandings team has provided web pages to export and import landing and production reports. system provides web pages that import and export landing and production reports. The import function is allows users to enter reports into eLandings without having to duplicate the data entry they have already done on their own business system. The import function expects that users will review the data as entered into eLandings, prior to submitting it. Adjustments to the report data may be made. This is particularly true for reports with IFQ, since eLandings allows the IFQ reports to be generated from the submitted landing report. It is not uncommon for generated IFQ reports to be edited before final submission.

The export function allows users to get reports in XML format, suitable for importing into third party system. Reports can also be exported in CSV or Microsoft Excel format, for users who manage their business with spreadsheets.

Using the eLandings web pages for interfaces to third party system has advantages and disadvantages for third party developers.

Advantages

The interface to eLandings is quicker and easier to build using the web page features. The third party system only had to read a file on user command to acquire eLandings data, and to write a file in the designated format if exporting data to eLandings. Users take the responsibility for transferring the files to and from eLandings.

For an interface where the third party system exports report files for import into eLandings, the need for automated error handling is reduced. The user is already in the loop, for transferring the file to eLandings using the import web page. If the eLandings system returns errors on the import the user receives and deals with them. IFQ report generation can be completely in the hands of the users, utilizing the eLandings web page functions for IFQ reporting. Generating IFQ reports correctly is among the most complex processes for landing reporting.

Disadvantages

  • more work for users
  • more contrained custom system
  • not appropriate for high volume
    • can hit 1000 record limit
  • less likely for new features to be developed/supported by eLandings staff
  • CSV file format updated less frequently than XML

We encourage third-party developers to use these methods while learning how to work with eLandings XML data structures. It may also serve as a temporary backup strategy if or when third-party applications become out of date with their eLandings XML schema definition. Although not recommended, third-party developers may choose to build applications that revolve sole around these web pages without making use of the public web services. This approach attempts to shifts work from the third-party developer to the user of the application and to eLandings developers. Such solutions may be cheaper to implement in the short term but more costly to maintain over time. It is predicted that end users will be less satisfied with third-party applications built on this philosophy.

...