...
Stat Area | Percent | Catch Distributed Weight | Rounded Weight | Adjustment | How Was a Line Chosen for Adjustment? | Catch IFQ Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
445931 | 40 | 400.4 | 400 | +1 | This line has the highest catch value | 401 |
445900 | 30 | 300.3 | 300 | 0 |
| 300 |
445830 | 30 | 300.3 | 300 | 0 |
| 300 |
Adjustments happen in several discrete steps
Rounding is a stepwise process, and to understand the results it is sometimes necessary to understand each step of the process. This example illustrates the steps involved with multiple IFQ permits (without maxout pounds), multiple stat areas, and multiple line items. (For eLandings staff, we have a /wiki/spaces/ft/pages/4390937, and the result can be viewed in eLandingsTest when logged in as AMACKEREL.)
Permits | Stat Areas | Sold Pounds | Deadloss Pounds |
|---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | 100 | 100 |
In this case the effort was unevenly distributed among the two stat areas, so the catch is unevenly distributed. When generating IFQ reports, the pounds are rounded to whole numbers, but those whole numbers don't add up to the total of 100 sold and 100 deadloss, so an adjustment is required to generate the correct total IFQ debit. In this case eLandings will make the adjustments to the line with the largest catch value. Adjustments can be positive or negative, and in this case, a catch adjustment of +1 pound is applied to the stat area with the largest catch value.
Stat Area | Percent | Catch Distributed Weight | Rounded Weight | Adjustment | How Was a Line Chosen for Adjustment? | Catch IFQ Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
445931 | 40 | 400.4 | 400 | +1 | This line has the highest catch value | 401 |
445900 | 30 | 300.3 | 300 | 0 |
| 300 |
445830 | 30 | 300.3 | 300 | 0 |
| 300 |