...
Permits | Stat Areas | Sold Pounds | Deadloss Pounds |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | 100 | 100 |
In this case the effort was unevenly distributed among the two stat areas, so the catch is unevenly distributed. When generating IFQ reports, the pounds are rounded to whole numbers, but those whole numbers don't add up to the total of 100 sold and 100 deadloss, so an adjustment is required to generate the correct total IFQ debit. In this case eLandings will make the adjustments to the line with the largest catch value. Adjustments can be positive or negative, and in this case, a catch adjustment of +1 pound is applied to the stat area with the largest catch valueWhen IFQ reports are generated, the stat area worksheet causes sold catch and deadloss to be distributed over two stat areas, with 75 pounds to stat area 575731 and 25 pounds to stat area 575732. The sold pounds and deadloss pounds are then evenly distributed among the two IFQ permits, rounding down because 75 and 25 are not evenly divisible by two, giving IFQ report items with 37 and 12 pounds respectively. Finally, integral amounts from fish ticket summaries are compared with the corresponding amounts on the IFQ reports (75 compared with 37+37, and 25 compared with 12+12), and one pound adjustments are applied to IFQ reports until they match Fish Ticket totals. Adjustments are applied to IFQ report items with maxout pounds first; within those with maxout pounds the smallest first; within those by IFQ Permit: next IFQ permit items with area/fishery; within those by area/fishery; within those by IFQ permit: then IFQ permit items with neither max out pounds or area/fishery by IFQ permit. In this case no IFQ report items have maxout or area/fishery, so the smallest (990051) IFQ permit gets the adjustment pounds in every case. Finally, IFQ reports are "leveled", and in this case, since one report got four positive rounding-related adjustments, while the other report got none... there are two adjustments of 1 pound each from the sold items on 990051's report to the corresponding sold items on 990052's report. The end result of the leveling is that 990051's report retains both rounding adjustments on its deadloss items, while 990052's report effectively acquires both rounding adjustments on its sold items.
IFQ Permit | Permit Allocation | Stat Area | Stat Area Percent | Disposition | Catch Distributed Weight | Rounded Weight | Rounding Adjustment | How Was a Line Chosen for Adjustment? | Leveling Adjustment | How Was a Line Chosen for Adjustment? | Catch IFQ Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
990051 | 50% | 575731 | 75 | Sold | 37.5 | 37 | +1 | This line has the highest catch value |
|
| 401 |
" | " | 575731 | 75 | Deadloss | 37.5 | 37 |
|
|
|
|
|
" | " | 575732 | 25 | Sold | 12.5 | 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
" | " | 575732 | 25 | Deadloss | 12.5 | 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
990052 | 50% | 575731 | 75 | Sold | 37.5 | 37 |
|
|
|
|
|
" | " | 575731 | 75 | Deadloss | 37.5 | 37 | 0 |
|
|
| 300 |
" | " | 575732 | 25 | Sold | 12.5 | 12 | 0 |
|
|
| 300 |
" | " | 575732 | 25 | Deadloss | 12.5 | 12 |
|
|
|
|
|