Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Complying with OMB's guidance for e-authentication, as required by NMFS  e-signature policy and procedural directive, requires agencies to work through an analytical process to evaluate e-signature alternatives to match e-signature tools to the e-government application being enabled. 
  • Neither the OMB policy nor NIST e-authentication technical guidance specifies solutions that agencies must use.
  • The first step in the analytical process is to understand the range of e-signature alternatives available to agencies and agree upon criteria for evaluating the e-signature alternatives.  (This is the subject of the August 20th meeting)
  • The second step is to evaluate a selected set of e-signature alternatives against some agreed-upon alternatives. (This is the subject of the August 27th September 3rd meeting)
  • Subsequent meetings will help complete the analytical steps called for in the NMFS e-signature policy and procedural directive.

...