Versions Compared

Version Old Version 21 New Version 22
Changes made by

Former user

Former user

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

STAKEHOLDER
GROUP

IMPACT/
RECOURSE

DESIRED OUTCOME

DEMAND FOR ESIGNATURES

PRIORITIES/ ENABLERS

CONCERNS/ BARRIERS

VALUE PROPOSITION

STRATEGY FOR ACTION

Who are the people who will be affected by what we want to do?

How can this group affect, positively or otherwise, what we want to do?

What specifically do we want this group to do with regard to our initiative?

What did they say they were interested in during initial meetings?

What is important to these stakeholders?

What other factors might enable these stakeholders' participation?

What are these stakeholders worried about?

What other factors might inhibit these stakeholders' participation?

Does what we're doing offer any specific benefit(s) to this group?

What do we plan to do to influence/ achieve the desired outcome?

Primary pilot candidates

eSignature team or program office have identified this program as potential pilot

 


 

 

 

 

National Permit System

Serve as a source of learning for our team.

Serve as a source of document examples and  templates. 

Provide us with CIO-office access and perspective.

Share their work products and lessons learned with our team. 

Exercise our evaluation process to test our evaluation criteria.

Allow us to cite their approved documents as additional examples in our final report.

 

Time.  The NPS team is on a very tight schedule.

Anything that might delay completion of their project.

Our focused and methodical approach might contribute to the quality of their proposal and lend their proposal additional credibility.

 

Secondary pilot candidates

eSignature team has had preliminary discussions with these program offices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Potential pilots

eSignature team has not yet "pitched" the idea of a pilot to these program offices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Internal Stakeholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IT Experts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CIO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Management Team for FIS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Program Offices (i.e., Fisheries)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regional Offices

must ultimately implement systems using our design

participate in our project

contribute ideas

review and comment

support the final product in the approval step

 

efficient operations

ease of use (to reduce support burden)

fraud

excessive support burden

improved customer satisfaction

reduced paperwork

faster workflow

 

Office of Law Enforcement

Has to review and possibly approve solutions?

Would like them to help shape alternatives and criteria to ensure approval

Necessary to enable electronic reporting and ensure accountability

Accuracy of data and accountability for data submitted

Solution(s) need to withstand judicial scrutiny and be consistent with case law

improves accuracy , makes individuals legally responsible for data they submit regardless of report

Get it right the first time and include OLE staff on team to help with "reach back" into organization and get hands on expertise.

General Counsel

GCF (in conjunction with F/CIO and GCEL) must approve our project outcome

advise, answer questions, and ultimately approve

 

legal sufficiency

legal efficiency

increased difficulty of prosecution

no

maintain lines of communication

NOAA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commerce

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service providers (examples)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Olfish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SiriusIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Catchlog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professional/Trade Groups (examples)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At-sea Processors Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

West Coast Seafood Processors Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pacific States Fisheries Management Council

PSFMC developed the electronic fish ticket software currently being used by NMFS in the Pacific Whiting Fishery and currently is piloting software for an electronic logbook for use in West Coast Fisheries.

Support development, incorporate and implement an e-signature into their e fish ticket and e lag book software.

e-signature is essential

an e- signature solution is necessary to expand their e fish ticket program and to implement their e-logbook program.

e-signature not happening, cost issues

Yes, enables expansion of their programs, ultimately means quicker, more accurate data collection.

Find an e-signature solution that will work for all stakeholders

Fishing Vessel Owner's Association, Seattle WA

This organization represents a significant portion of  the West Coast fixed gear groundfish fleet, who will be reporting fishing activity through a Federal logbook beginning as early as 2009.

support, provide input, and advocate implementation

Identity theft issues (question)

log book itself is very important, timeliness of reporting is important

system must be user friendly

logbook may produce a better record for their own purposes

meet stakeholders needs, desires.

Partner Organizations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States (e.g., Alaska)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Countries (e.g., Canada)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions (e.g., Tuna or Halibut)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

End User Community

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-profit organizations (filers)

 

File for themselves or on behalf of others

 

 

 

 

 

For-profit organizations (filers)

 

File for themselves or on behalf of others

 

 

 

 

 

Individuals (filers)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Oversight/ Public Interest*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OMB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congress (authorizing committees)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congress (appropriating committees)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GAO