Versions Compared

Version Old Version 11 New Version 12
Changes made by

Larry Talley - NOAA Federal (Unlicensed)

Former user

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

STAKEHOLDER
GROUP

IMPACT/
RECOURSE

DESIRED OUTCOME

DEMAND FOR ESIGNATURES

PRIORITIES/ ENABLERS

CONCERNS/ BARRIERS

VALUE PROPOSITION

STRATEGY FOR ACTION

Who are the people who will be affected by what we want to do?

How can this group affect, positively or otherwise, what we want to do?

What specifically do we want this group to do with regard to our initiative?

What did they say they were interested in during initial meetings?

What is important to these stakeholders?

What other factors might enable these stakeholders' participation?

What are these stakeholders worried about?

What other factors might inhibit these stakeholders' participation?

Does what we're doing offer any specific benefit(s) to this group?

What do we plan to do to influence/ achieve the desired outcome?

Primary pilot candidates

eSignature team or program office have identified this program as potential pilot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  National Permit System

Serve as a source of learning for our team

We want them to have their solution go through our evaluation process to test our evaluation criteria

 

 

 

 

 

Secondary pilot candidates

eSignature team has had preliminary discussions with these program offices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Potential pilots

eSignature team has not yet "pitched" the idea of a pilot to these program offices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Internal Stakeholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IT Experts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CIO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Management Team for FIS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Program Offices (i.e., Fisheries)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regional Offices

must ultimately implement systems using our design

participate in our project

contribute ideas

review and comment

support the final product in the approval step

 

efficient operations

ease of use (to reduce support burden)

fraud

excessive support burden

improved customer satisfaction

reduced paperwork

faster workflow

 

Office of Law Enforcement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Counsel

GCF (in conjunction with F/CIO and GCEL) must approve our project outcome

advise, answer questions, and ultimately approve

 

legal sufficiency
legal efficiency

increased difficulty of prosecution

no

maintain lines of communication

NOAA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commerce

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service providers (examples)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Olfish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SiriusIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Catchlog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professional/Trade Groups (examples)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At-sea Processors Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

West Coast Seafood Processors Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partner Organizations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States (e.g., Alaska)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Countries (e.g., Canada)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions (e.g., Tuna or Halibut)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

End User Community

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-profit organizations (filers)

 

File for themselves or on behalf of others

 

 

 

 

 

For-profit organizations (filers)

 

File for themselves or on behalf of others

 

 

 

 

 

Individuals (filers)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Oversight/ Public Interest*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OMB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congress (authorizing committees)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congress (appropriating committees)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GAO