Versions Compared

Version Old Version 5 New Version 6
Changes made by

Larry Talley - NOAA Federal (Unlicensed)

Larry Talley - NOAA Federal (Unlicensed)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

STAKEHOLDER
GROUP

IMPACT/
RECOURSE

DESIRED OUTCOME

DEMAND FOR ESIGNATURES

PRIORITIES/ ENABLERS

CONCERNS/ BARRIERS

VALUE PROPOSITION

STRATEGY FOR ACTION

Who are the people who will be affected by what we want to do?

How can this group affect, positively or otherwise, what we want to do?

What specifically do we want this group to do with regard to our initiative?

What did they say they were interested in during initial meetings?

What is important to these stakeholders?

What other factors might enable these stakeholders' participation?

What are these stakeholders worried about?

What other factors might inhibit these stakeholders' participation?

Does what we're doing offer any specific benefit(s) to this group?

What do we plan to do to influence/ achieve the desired outcome?

Primary pilot candidates

eSignature team or program office have identified this program as potential pilot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secondary pilot candidates

eSignature team has had preliminary discussions with these program offices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Potential pilots

eSignature team has not yet "pitched" the idea of a pilot to these program offices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Internal Stakeholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IT Experts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CIO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Management Team for FIS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Program Offices (i.e., Fisheries)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regional Offices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Law Enforcement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Counsel

GCF (in conjunction with F/CIO and GCEL) must approve our project outcome

advise, answer questions, and ultimately approve


assumptions prior to dialog: 


legal sufficiency
legal efficiency : evidentiary assumption of attribution

 

 

legal sufficiency
legal efficiency increasing difficulty of prosecution


 

 

 

 

 

NOAA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commerce

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service providers (examples)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Olfish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SiriusIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Catchlog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professional/Trade Groups (examples)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At-sea Processors Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

West Coast Seafood Processors Association

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partner Organizations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States (e.g., Alaska)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Countries (e.g., Canada)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions (e.g., Tuna or Halibut)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

End User Community

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-profit organizations (filers)

 

File for themselves or on behalf of others

 

 

 

 

 

For-profit organizations (filers)

 

File for themselves or on behalf of others

 

 

 

 

 

Individuals (filers)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Oversight/ Public Interest*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OMB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congress (authorizing committees)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congress (appropriating committees)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GAO