Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 66 Next »

Proposed eSignature Meeting Schedule

  • Call on July 30
    • Review this proposed schedule
    • Review Stakeholder Grid (Due July 25)
    • Reach agreement on pilots
    • Understand to-dos under communications plan
    • Introduction to the Alternative Analysis
  • Call on August 20
    • Review e-signature alternatives
      • Tuna permit
      • NPS-like username/password
      • PKI or federated identity based
    • Review Criteria for Alternative Analysis
  • Call on September 3
    • ThinkTank Session on Alternatives Analysis
    • Map e-signature alternatives to OMB assurance levels 
    • Likely Criteria
      • Risk Mitigation 
      • Usability
      • Ease of Implemenation
      • Affordability
  • Call on September 17
    • Review e-signatures Pilots for Risk Assessment
      • Pilot A (National Permit System)
      • Pilot B (Hawaii Long-line e-logbook)
      • Pilot C (Hawaii bottomfish e-logbook)
      • Pilot D (West Coast fixed gear e-logbook)
      • Pilot E (West Coast Federal e-logbook)
    • Review Criteria for Pilot Evaluation
  • Call on October 1
    • ThinkTank Session on Risk Assessment
      • Pilot Criteria
        • Legal/Policy Mandate (Y/N)--(i.e., Magnuson Reauthorization Act or NMFS regulation)
        • Executive Sponsorship (low, med, high)
        • Cycle Time Improvement (low, med, high)
        • Compliance Impact (Y/N) Can we manage fisheries according to our plan without the electronic transfer of data?
        • Volume of Transactions (low, med, high)
      • Level of Assurance
        • Category of Harm
        • Likelihood of Harm
    • Discuss design for 10/15 and 10/29 to focus on business/implementation plan readiness for Hawaii non-commercial bottomfish logbook as a pilot
  • Call on October 15
    • Think Tank Session on Risk Assessment (continued and redone for level of assurance)
      • Category of Harm
      • Likelihood of Harm
      • Map agreed-upon assurance level to NMFS e-signature "types" evaluated earlier in process 
  • Call on October 29
    • Share draft business plan template for Hawaii Longline Logbook E-Signature Risk Assessment with team to validate data and also ensure consistency with procedural directive to include elements such as: 
      • "as is" process
      • demand for e-signatures
      • risk assessment
      • costs estimates
      • benefits estimates
      • benefit cost analysis
      • the new electronic process enabled by e-signatures including implementation requirements, including:
        • Technical non-repudiation services
        • Legal binding of the electronic transaction to the individual or entity (i.e., end-user)
        • Chain of Custody Audit Trails
        • Electronic Reciept or Acknowledgement of Successful Submission
        • Use of Information Collected in the Electronic Signature Authentication Process
        • Long-term Retention and Access Policy
        • Review and Re-evaluation of the Electronic Signature Process 
  • Call on November 12
    • Capstone meeting for group discuss lessons learned and next steps since this is our last scheduled meeting:
      • Discuss lessons learned from data gathered by Jared
      • Brainstorm ideas on how disseminate the work products of the group and the process we used
      • Agree on next steps for remaining three pilots 
  • No labels